Wednesday, December 31, 2008

who dares





  first of all let me tell you that i have just had a phone call with ola , she is ok with all her familly .she told me she went out out yesterday and had a walk in the streets of gaza , she even made some reports .and with an outburst of laughetr she said "a rocket fell  just nearby while i was walking ".we are all fearing for her and for all the palestinian people  but believe me  they are stronger than us and more courageous .being besieged and bombed is a thing that nobody can bear still they are undrgoing these hardships  with a great sense of courage and bravour .
 but we  free and outside the siege zone , helpless as we are we should feel ashamed of being unable to change things ,. i'am speaking about all the humanity . globalisation which should have brought us closer and made us more concerned about others' sufferings,globalisation that is meant to  generate wealth and improve living standards of poeple around the world is making the gap wider and wider .the rich are being richer , the poor poorer , and those who are suffering are every day exposed to new forms of torture and  humilation ....bob dylan said " how many roads must a man walk down before we can call him a man and how many seas must a white dove sail before she sleeps on the sand ....and i say how many palestinian should remain on earth before our consciousness raise .the answer my friend is blowing in the wind ;;;;;;;


 


Organisez une fête en un tour de main : invitation, photos, blog…

Téléchargez le nouveau Windows Live Messenger ! Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit !

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Has Israel Revived Hamas?

Washington Post 

By Daoud Kuttab

Tuesday, December 30, 2008; A15

JERUSALEM -- In its efforts to stop amateur rockets from nagging the residents of some of its southern cities, Israel appears to have given new life to the fledging Islamic movement in Palestine.

For two years, the Islamic Resistance Movement (known by its Arabic acronym, Hamas) has been losing support internally and externally. This wasn't the case in the days after the party came to power democratically in early 2006; despite being unjustly ostracized by the international community for its anti-Israeli stance, Hamas enjoyed the backing of Palestinians and other Arabs. Having won a decisive parliamentary majority on an anti-corruption platform promising change and reform, Hamas worked hard to govern better than had Fatah, its rival and predecessor.

Things began to sour when Hamas violently seized control of Gaza, but even then, Hamas enjoyed considerable domestic support -- and much goodwill externally. Then the movement turned down every legitimate offer from its nationalist PLO rivals and Egyptian mediators to pursue reconciliation, and support for it began to slip.

Things got worse in November when a carefully planned national unity effort from the Egyptians failed because, at the very last minute, Hamas's leaders refused to show up in Cairo. Failure to accept this roundtable invitation greatly upset the Egyptians, and they and other Arab leaders scolded Hamas publicly. Omar Suleiman, the head of the Egyptian intelligence service who was organizing the meeting, termed Hamas's reasons for rebuffing the invitation "unwarranted excuses." Hamas sought for its leader a seating position equivalent to the Palestinian president's, and it wanted Hamas security prisoners held in the West Bank to be released. Palestinian nationalists insist that Hamas's rejection of unity talks was solely to avoid the PLO's demand for new presidential and parliamentary elections.

A poll carried out afterward by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Center showed that most Palestinians blamed Hamas for the failure of the talks. The survey, which was sponsored by the German Fredrich Ebert Foundation, found that 35.3 percent of respondents believed Hamas bore more responsibility for the stalemate. Fatah was blamed by 17.9 percent, and 12.3 percent said both Fatah and Hamas were responsible.

The lack of international support since the 2006 elections, followed by this rebuff to Gaza's only Arab neighbor, Egypt, compounded the deterioration of Hamas's internal support. By November, the survey showed, only 16.6 percent of Palestinians supported Hamas, compared with nearly 40 percent favoring Fatah. The decline in support for Hamas has been steady: A year earlier, the same pollster showed that Hamas's support was at 19.7 percent; in August 2007, it was at 21.6 percent; in March 2007, it was at 25.2 percent; and in September 2006, backing for the Islamists stood at 29.7 percent.

That's why, as the six-month cease-fire with Israel came to an end, Hamas calculated -- it seems correctly -- that it had nothing to gain by continuing the truce; if it had, its credentials as a resistance movement would have been no different from those of Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah. Unable to secure an open border and an end to the Israeli siege, while refusing to share or give up power to Abbas, Hamas could have had no route to renewed public favor.

For different reasons, Hamas and Israel both gave up on the cease-fire, preferring instead to climb over corpses to reach their political goals. One side wants to resuscitate its public support by appearing to be a heroic resister, while the other, on the eve of elections, wants to show toughness to a public unhappy with the nuisance of the Qassam rockets.

The disproportionate and heavy-handed Israeli attacks on Gaza have been a bonanza for Hamas. The movement has renewed its standing in the Arab world, secured international favor further afield and succeeded in scuttling indirect Israeli-Syrian talks and direct Palestinian-Israeli negotiations. It has also greatly embarrassed Israel's strongest Arab neighbors, Egypt and Jordan.

While it is not apparent how this violent confrontation will end, it is abundantly clear that the Islamic Hamas movement has been brought back from near political defeat while moderate Arab leaders have been forced to back away from their support for any reconciliation with Israel.

By choosing the waning days of the Bush administration to attack Gaza, the Israelis knew they would face no opposition from the leader of the so-called war on terrorism. Just as George W. Bush's misadventure in Iraq played into the hands of radicals and terrorists, this Israeli action will produce nothing less than that in Palestine. Let us hope that the Obama administration will see the consequences of what is not only a crime of war but also a move whose results are exactly the opposite of its publicly proclaimed purposes.

Daoud Kuttab is a Palestinian journalist and a former Ferris professor of journalism at Princeton University.

(And a FOJO associate...) /Saam

Gaza - the economic fallout for Israel

Israel's Gaza War: The Economic Fallout
Factory shutdowns near the Gaza Strip are indications of how a
prolonged conflict could tip Israel's slumping economy into a serious
tailspin
By Neal Sandler

Located in the kibbutz of Kfar Aza, just a kilometer from the border
with the Gaza Strip, chemical company Kafrit Industries (KAFR)
operates one of the dozens of factories ordered to shut down until
further notice by the Israeli government, just after its air force
carried out massive air strikes on the Hamas-controlled territory.
Even before the latest escalation of violence began on Dec. 27, the
producer of additives used in the plastics industry had to deal with
intermittent Palestinian rocket fire. But lately Kafrit
Industries—like most Israeli companies—has been more concerned about
the impact of the global recession.

Now, the worst Israeli-Palestinian military flare-up in years has
taken center stage. "Up to now we've been able to meet all of our
commitments, but the security situation has now made operating our
business even more challenging," says Avi Zalcman, chief executive of
Kafrit. Luckily for the company, it has plants in Germany and China
that can at least partially offset the loss of production in Israel.
But others like RMH Lachish Industries (LHIS), a producer of
agricultural machinery based in nearby Sderot, are less fortunate.
"One hundred percent of our production is for export, and we've
already had to cancel orders," says Gershon Goldberg, CEO of Lachish.

The impact on the Israeli economy is only starting to be felt. So far,
plant closures have been limited to nonessential facilities within 4.5
kilometers (2.8 miles) of the Gaza border. Farther afield—though still
within range of Palestinian rocket fire—companies like Intel (INTC),
which employs 2,000 workers at a semiconductor facility in Kiryat Gat,
are continuing to operate at full capacity.
Eyes on the Deficit

The shutdown of plants near Gaza is a relatively minor part of the
broader impact on the Israeli economy of renewed warfare. Israel's
Manufacturers Assn. pegs the current loss of production at $1 million
a day. And though it's still too early to assess the final cost of the
military operation, unofficial estimates have put the price tag at $25
million to $50 million a day. "The cost will run up sharply if
reserves are called up for a ground operation and if the conflict goes
on for more than a few weeks," predicts Leo Leiderman, chief economist
at Israel's Bank Hapoalim (POLI.TA).

Jittery traders worried about geopolitics drove the price of oil up by
as much as 12% on Dec. 29, to $42.20 per barrel before it settled back
below $39. But the reaction of Israel's financial markets has so far
been fairly muted. The shekel has barely budged against the U.S.
dollar in recent days (though it has weakened vs. the euro), even
despite a 75-basis-point interest rate cut, to 1.75%, by the central
Bank of Israel late on Dec. 29 that's intended to spur the economy.

Stocks, too, aren't faring badly. After initially dropping on Sunday
in response to the Israeli air strikes on Gaza, the Tel Aviv stock
market recovered part of its lost ground on Dec. 29. Analysts say the
real test for local financial markets will be the impact of the
military operation on the budget deficit.
"If the deficit increases sharply, this could have a very negative
effect on the shekel and the stock market," says Michael Sarel, chief
economist at Harel Insurance & Finance (HARL.TA), one of Israel's
leading financial companies.

Even without the new conflict, Israel's budget deficit in 2009 was
projected to be at least 5% of gross domestic product, up from an
expected 1.6% in 2008, due to a sharp decline in tax revenues and
plans for increased spending to counter the slowdown. The high cost of
a lengthy military operation could lead to a further mounting of the
deficit.
A Vulnerable Economy

Over the years, the Israeli economy has learned to adjust to various
levels of hostility. However, unlike the situation in 2006, when the
economic boom was only briefly interrupted by the 40-day war in
Lebanon against Hezbollah, the economy is now significantly more
vulnerable. After five years of rapid economic growth averaging around
5% annually, the boom came to a screeching halt in the third quarter
of 2008 as the global recession hit the local economy.

The bad news continues to pile in. Industrial production fell by 3.5%
from August to October, while consumer spending was down by 4.2% in
the same period and export growth has fallen off. Even unemployment,
which fell to 6% in the third quarter—its lowest level in years—is on
the rise. Thousands of workers have been laid off in recent weeks from
the country's high-tech industry, which accounts for more than 40% of
Israel's industrial exports and has been hit by the global downturn.

Most experts have been forecasting 2009 economic growth at no more
than 1%. But those projections were made prior to the latest
escalation of violence. They could prove overly optimistic if the
violence continues and Israel gets bogged down in a lengthy operation
in the Gaza Strip. The impact would be even worse if the fighting
widened into a regional conflict.

Neal Sandler is a correspondent for BusinessWeek

Monday, December 29, 2008

When tragedy has a human face

I am, by nature, a very sympathetic person.... Politically, I stand to
the left because I always want to "share" with other people, because I
see people as equal, because social stratification does not mean much
to me. I tend to feel with other people's pain, particularly people
whom I have been fortunate to have them cross my path and enrich me.
OK, I admit, my stay in Kalmar probably did not make me the most
popular one from the bunch - I was reclusive, too work-obsessed,
introverted and did not participate as much as I ought to have in the
group activities (Although I still think that the pasta I cooked was
truly good!), this is not some mea culpa, this is how I am and make no
appologies about it, but I write this blog entry because only this
morning I was explaining to a German friend in Beirut that during the
war there was always a haven of safety in the middle of all the
madness and for some reason I added "I know someone in Gazza right
now, I hope she and her family are safe, but I also know that there
must be a haven there too...."
I am by no means diminishing the internsity or magnitude of what is
going on in Gaza, but I have to admit that whereas previously I was
sympathetic with the people in Gazza "theoretically" and just out of
sheer human altruism, today, tragedy has a human face for me - Ola,
her husband and her three children. I particularly think of Rasha, her
15 months-old daughter, who is either blissfully unaware of what is
going on, or - on the contrary - has her mind registering the sights
and sounds in front of her.
Because I am a child of war myself, I think of Malek too - Ola's
second child but first son (Hence her nickname "Oum Malek") and I
think of myself at the age of 10 in an war-torn Beirut and wonder if
Malek will grow up to have the same war reflexes as me and my
generation had.
I cannot recall the context, but at some point during our course in
Sweden, I said something and Saam asked me: "Are you being an optimist
or a cynic Tarek?" to which I replied "I am being a realist."
But, the realist in me cannot but be an optimist - maybe that's how my
people and myself survived the war - and now I think of Ola and her
smiling face with her luggage waiting to cross to Egypt and join us in
the course - I know that, even in the deepest shelter in Gazza, this
smile still resonates (Probably soothing Rasha into a tight sleep) and
is the best weapon against any agression, a proof of will to live, to
defy, to beat oblivion and death.

Post by: TJC

Monday, December 22, 2008

In booming gulf, some women find freedom in the sky

Catherine Zoepf (IHT)
ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates: Marwa Abdel Aziz Fathi giggled
self-consciously as she looked down at the new wing-shaped brooch on
the left breast pocket of her crisp gray uniform, then around the room
at the dozens of other Etihad flight attendants all chatting and
eating canapés around her.

It was graduation day at Etihad Training Academy, where the national
airline of the United Arab Emirates holds a seven-week training course
for new flight attendants. Downstairs are the cavernous classrooms
where Fathi and other trainees rehearsed meal service plans in
life-size mockups of planes and trained in the swimming pool, where
they learned how to evacuate passengers in the event of an emergency
landing over water.

Despite her obvious pride, Fathi, a 22-year-old from Egypt, was amazed
to find herself here.

"I never in my life thought I'd work abroad," said Fathi, who was a
university student in Cairo when she began noticing newspaper
advertisements recruiting young Egyptians to work at airlines based in
the Gulf. "My family thought I was crazy. But then some families don't
let you leave at all."

A decade ago, unmarried Arab women like Fathi, working outside their
home countries, were rare. But just as young men from poor Arab
nations flocked to the oil-rich Gulf states for jobs, more young women
are doing so, sociologists say, though no official statistics are kept
on how many.

Flight attendants have become the public face of the new mobility for
some young Arab women, just as they were the face of new freedoms for
women in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s. They have become a
subject of social anxiety and fascination in much the same way.

The dormitory here where the Etihad flight attendants live after
training looks much like the city's many 1970s-style office blocks,
its windows iridescent like gasoline on a puddle. But there are three
security guards on the ground floor, a logbook for sign-ins and strict
rules. Anyone who tries to sneak a man back to one of the simply
furnished two-bedroom suites that the women share may be dismissed,
even deported.

In the midst of an Islamic revival across the Arab world that is
largely being led by young people, gulf states like Abu Dhabi — which
offer freedoms and opportunities nearly unimaginable elsewhere in the
Middle East — have become an unlikely place of refuge for some young
Arab women. And many say that the experience of living independently
and working hard for high salaries has forever changed their ambitions
and their beliefs about themselves, though it can also lead to a
painful sense of alienation from their home countries and their
families.

At almost any hour of the day or night, there are a dozen or more
young women with identical rolling suitcases waiting in the lobby of
their dormitory to be picked up for work on Etihad flights. Though
several are still drowsily applying makeup — and the more
steady-handed have perfected a back-of-the-bus toilette that takes
exactly the length of their usual ride to Abu Dhabi International
Airport — they are uniformly well ironed and blow-dried. Those with
longer hair wear black hair-ties wrapped around meticulously
hair-netted ponytails. They wear jaunty little caps with attached
gauzy scarves that hint at hijab, the head coverings worn by many
Muslim women. Like college students during exams, all of them gripe
good-naturedly about how little they have slept.

There are exclamations of congratulation and commiseration as the
women learn friends' assignments. Most coveted are long-haul routes to
places like Toronto and Sydney, Australia, where layovers may last
many days, hotels are comfortable and per diem allowances from the
airline to cover food and incidentals are generous. Short-haul flights
to places like Khartoum, Sudan, are dreaded: more than four hours of
work, followed by refueling, a new load of passengers, an exhausting
late-night return flight to Abu Dhabi and the shuttle bus back to the
dormitory tower with its vigilant guards.

Upstairs, scrubbed of their thick, professional makeup, most of the
women look a decade younger. They seem to subsist on snack food: toast
made, Arabic-style, by waving flaps of pita over an open flame;
slivers of cheap, oversalted Bulgarian cheese; the Lebanese
date-filled cookies called ajweh; pillowy rolls from a local Cinnabon
outlet that one young Syrian flight attendant proclaimed herself
addicted to (an expression she used with self-conscious delight, a
badge of newfound worldliness).

They watch bootlegged DVDs — "Desperate Housewives," "Sex and the
City" — bought on layovers in Bangladesh and Indonesia. They drift
along the tiled floors between their rooms in velour sweatpants and
fuzzy slippers, and they keep their voices low: someone is always
trying to catch a wink of sleep before her flight.

Lonely Existence

It is a hushed, lonely and fluorescent-lighted existence, and it is
leavened mostly by nights out dancing. Despite the increasing numbers
of women moving to the gulf countries, the labor migration patterns of
the last 20 years have left the Emirates with a male-female ratio that
is more skewed than anywhere else in the world; in the 15-to-64 age
group, there are more than 2.7 men for every woman.

Etihad flight attendants are such popular additions to Abu Dhabi's
modest hotel bar scene that their presence is encouraged by frequent
"Ladies' Nights" and cabin-crew-only drink discounts. It is almost
impossible for an unveiled woman in her 20s to go to a mall or grocery
store in Abu Dhabi without being asked regularly, by grinning
strangers, if she is a stewardess.

One evening last fall, an Egyptian flight attendant for Etihad with
dyed blond hair and five-inch platform heels led a friend — a
23-year-old Tunisian woman wearing a sparkly white belt who said that
she had come to the Emirates hoping to find work as a seamstress — up
to the entrance of the Sax nightclub at the Royal Meridien Hotel.

Just inside, in the bar area, several young Emirates men in white
dishdashas were dancing jerkily to deafening club music.

lutching her friend by the elbow, the Egyptian woman indicated one of
the bouncers. "Isn't he just so yummy?" she shrieked. The bouncer, who
had plainly heard, ignored her, and the women filed past. Despite
appearances, explained the Egyptian flight attendant — who asked not
to be named because she was not authorized by Etihad to speak to the
news media — sex and dating are very fraught matters for most of the
young Arab women who come to work in the Emirates.

Some young women cope with their new lives away from home by becoming
almost nunlike, keeping to themselves and remaining very observant
Muslims, she said, while others quickly find themselves in the arms of
unsuitable men. "With the Arabic girls who come to work here, you get
two types," the Egyptian woman said. "They're either very closed up
and scared and they don't do anything, or else they're not really
thinking about flying — they're just here to get their freedom.
They're really naughty and crazy."

Treated Like a Heroine

Rania Abou Youssef, 26, a flight attendant for the Dubai-based
airline, Emirates, said that when she went home to Alexandria, Egypt,
her female cousins treated her like a heroine. "I've been doing this
for four years," she said, "and still they're always asking, 'Where
did you go and what was it like and where are the photographs?' "

Many of the young Arab women working in the Gulf take delight in their
status as pioneers, role models for their friends and younger female
relatives. Young women brought up in a culture that highly values
community, they have learned to see themselves as individuals.

For many families, allowing a daughter to work, much less to travel
overseas unaccompanied, may call her virtue into question and threaten
her marriage prospects. Yet this culture is changing, said Musa
Shteiwi, a sociologist at Jordan University in Amman. "We're noticing
more and more single women going to the gulf these days," he said.
"It's still not exactly common, but over the last four or five years
it's become quite an observable phenomenon."

Unemployment levels across the Arab world remain high. As the networks
of Arab expatriates in the gulf countries become stronger and as
cellphones and expanding Internet access make overseas communication
more affordable, some families have grown more comfortable with the
idea of allowing daughters to work here. Some gulf-based employers now
say they tailor recruitment procedures for young women with Arab
family values in mind. They may hire groups of women from a particular
town or region, for example, so the women can support one another once
in the gulf. "A lot of girls do this now because this has a reputation
for being very safe," said Enas Hassan, an Iraqi flight attendant for
Emirates. "The families have a sense of security. They know that if
their girls start flying they won't be thrown into the wide world
without protection."

A Feeling of Displacement
Yet not everyone can make peace with life in the United Arab Emirates,
the young flight attendants say. Even the landscape — block after
sterile block of hotels and office buildings with small shops and
takeout restaurants on their lower floors — can contribute to a
feeling of displacement. Nearly all year long, for most of the day,
the sunlight is bright white, so harsh that it obliterates all
contrast. Despite vigilant watering, even the palm trees on roadsides
look grayish and embattled.

Some of the young women tell stories of fellow flight attendants who
have simply slipped onto planes to their home countries and run away,
without giving notice to the airline.

The most successful Arab flight attendants, they say, are often those
whose circumstances have already placed them somehow at the margins of
their home societies: young immigrant women who are supporting their
families after the death of a male breadwinner, for example, and a
handful of young widows and divorced women who are eventually
permitted to work overseas after their prospects of remarriage have
dimmed.

Far more than other jobs they might find in the gulf, flying makes it
difficult for Muslim women to fulfill religious duties like praying
five times a day and fasting during Ramadan, the Egyptian attendant
noted. She said she hoped to wear the hijab one day, "just not yet." A
sense of disconnection from their religion can add to feelings of
alienation from conservative Muslim communities back home. Young women
whose work in the gulf supports an extended family often find, to
their surprise and chagrin, that work has made them unsuitable for
life within that family.

"A very good Syrian friend of mine decided to resign from the airline
and go back home," the Egyptian flight attendant said. "But she can't
tolerate living in a family house anymore. Her parents love her
brother and put him first, and she's never allowed out alone, even if
it's just to go and have a coffee."

"It becomes very difficult to go home again," she said.

Posted by: TJC

Friday, December 19, 2008

Stalemate on "Mahram" condition continues

Saudi Arabia

 

Najah Alosaimi
Arab News(07/28/2008)
 

 

A clash between the Saudi Ministry of Higher Education and the saudi Human Rights Commission over the issue of requiring female students receiving scholarships to go to foreign countries to have a mahram, guardian, to travel with them. The added expense and layers of complication make it impossible for many women to accept these Saudi government scholarships. The Human Rights Commission in saudi arabia is asking the Council of Ministers to instead permit guardians to issue letters granting the women permission to travel and live abroad. The Ministry of Higher Education is sticking to its guns in requiring the physical presence of a mahram, acting , in fear of social backlash and condemnation for putting the women at moral risk. The Human Rights Commission, conversely, sees the women as adults and capable of leading their lives according to the moral values in which they were raised. The ministry current rules regarding the necessity of bringing a male as a provision for women to study abroad conflicts with Article 26, from Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides that everyone has the right to education. The ministry confiscate scholarships  between the Saudi Ministry of Higher Education and the saudi Human Rights Commission over the issue of requiring female students receiving scholarships to go to foreign countries to have a mahram, guardian, to travel with them. The added expense and layers of complication make it impossible for many women to accept these Saudi government scholarships. The Human Rights Commission in saudi arabia is asking the Council of Ministers to instead permit guardians to issue letters granting the women permission to travel and live abroad. The Ministry of Higher Education is sticking to its guns in requiring the physical presence of a mahram, acting , in fear of social backlash and condemnation for putting the women at moral risk. The Human Rights Commission, conversely, sees the women as adults and capable of leading their lives according to the moral values in which they were raised. The ministry current rules regarding the necessity of bringing a male as a provision for women to study abroad conflicts with Article 26, from Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides that everyone has the right to education. The ministry confiscate scholarships
 
  nb/  it is an old article but i find it very interesting .
 
     ouarda lebnane


Glissez - déplacez : c'est si simple de partager vos photos sur Windows Live™ Photos !

Wednesday, December 17, 2008


Student to Boutros Ghali: Democracy in Egypt Kept me in Jail without Trial for 13 Years

  By   Wael Ali and Omar el-Sheykh    17/ 12/ 2008

Ghali

The Chairman of the National Council for Human Rights, Boutros Ghali, found himself in an embarrassing situation yesterday at a celebration held at Beni Suef University for the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A student attending the celebration, who said had spent 13 years in prison, fiercely criticized Ghali and the situation of human rights in Egypt.
At the end of Ghali's speech, the student stood up on the balcony of he hall opposite to the panel and said: "There are no human rights in Egypt, there are just animals rights."
Beni Suef University Vice-President el-Mursi Mohamed el-Mursi tried to interrupt him saying: "If you have a question, write it on a piece of paper like your colleagues and we'll submit it to Dr. Boutros".
"I'm Mohamed Abdel Wahab Mursi and I was a political prisoner from 1994 to 2007. If you don't let me speak, I'll jump from this balcony onto the students" he replied.
"Where are human rights in Egypt?" the student answered. The vice-president tried to cut short his intervention, but he failed and the some 500 students attending the ceremony clapped Mr. Mohamed. At that point, the vice-president could do nothing but to leave him the floor.
"Where's democracy in Egypt? Is it the one that kept me behind bars for 13 years with no trial? And I'm saying this although I know that State Security is here today" the student said.
"Besides, what is the tie between the National Council for Human Rights in Egypt and its counterparts in the Arab countries?"
Before he could be given any answer, he said: "I'm not going to listen to any answer, as I know the guys are waiting for me to take me to jail."
The student then left the hall with a member of Beni Suef University.
Dr. Ghali answered by saying: "At the Council, we have a committee dealing with such complaints. We then submit these complaints to executive bodies, as the Council has no executive power."
 
 
/ NA

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Reject barefoot journalism!

On December 14, 2008 President Bush and Prime Minister Maliki had a press conference in Baghdad. An Iraqi journalist threw his shoes one at a time at the American president. Interestingly Mr. Bush moved very quickly and dodged the shoes so none of them hit him. Apparently he is physically very fit and might have an extensive experience in dodge ball. Most likely dodge shoes becomes the favorite game of children who watch Al-Jazirah. I am wondering if the angry man had thrown the shoes at his own current leaders who welcomed Mr. Bush, would Prime Minister Maliki or President Talibani have been fit enough to protect themselves from being hit; probably not.
Nobody claims that President Bush is flawless or that he should not be criticized. In fact almost every American journalist including the one from his own party rightfully criticize him on a regular basis for his mistakes. However, compare to Saddam whom he removed from power, President Bush is actually a saint. President Bush did not feel insulted and even made a joke about the size of the thrown shoes, which might indicate his mental fitness. I am wondering if the angry man had thrown his shoes at Saddam, would he or any of his family members had been allowed to live any longer; probably not.
Although I am not an Iraqi but a Kurd, I felt embarrassed for the behavior of the angry reporter. For decades Kurds and Iraqis have fought for freedom of speech and press. If a journalist can not respect his own profession and violates the rules of free press, how could the world trust the region to become free? As Middle Eastern we are already labeled as barefoot people for taking off our shoes at our homes, mosques, beaches, and deserts. We do not need our reporters to be labeled as barefoot journalists and denied access to conferences where keeping shoes on is part of an appropriate attire and manner! In fact we need to reject barefoot journalism.
Considering his behavior, probably the angry reporter does not qualify to be a journalist at this stage of his life. The best thing he could do is to apologize to the American people for insulting their president and seek anger management classes. Once he has recovered, he might return to his profession and politely ask the American president when will we be free or as we ask in Kurdish kay azadabeen?

Monday, December 15, 2008

Rania impersonates Letterman


A jordanian TV personality you all know sent me this. And what  to make of it...

I sent it to Rami (your Jordanian blog guru in exile) and he thought it was lovely and thinks Rania is telling the truth. It is because she has no friends on Facebook...

It is interresting from what Kristina Riegert talked about though. How power uses media, and mimics it, to get their message across. In this case it is blatant, but problably quite effective since she does it so well and the PR guys have scripted it well.

The question is though: Who is impressed and who will listen? Many Europeans will definitely not listen since all her references and jokes are American and do not play to Europeans. Many in Europe probably feel like I did. "What a jerk she is only reaching out to the Americans, when there are probably better friends to find elsewhere!"

Will Americans be impressed? I am not sure. But some will probably be thinking that there seems to be some civilized arabs out there that likes us. Others will still not get that she is the Queen of Jordan since she has got an American accent and is not wearing a veil...

And what will arabs think about it? You tell me! In the comments section below please!

One thing is sure though. If there is a revolution and Jordan becomes a Republic. Her Majesty can easily find a job when in exile – as TV host.

/SK

Bush shoe attack

So the al Baghadadiya reporter is in custody and there are demonstrations in Sadr City to release the hero. Bush himself says it was most humiliating for Mr al Zaidis Iraqi colleagues. Yes probably.


It reminds me when a production company called Strix was recording a new humor programme for SVT called "Balls of Steel". Their blonde reporter had a fake microphone that sprayed water - and she sprayed the prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt at a movie opening. Also then the Secret Service was very slow. They did not even wrestle her down (it could have been acid). 

The fake reporter, Hanna Wilenius, was convicted for Molestation according to criminal law and fined the equivalent of USD 3000. It was not an act protected by the Swedish constitution and SVT reporters were very upset since the good name of SVT news hade been tarnished. The Prime Minister gave testimony in court saying she was carrying a trustworthy microphone logo so he thought it was something important she was going to ask.

The programme never aired on SVT, it was bought by another channel and quickly discontinued.

/SK

the lapidation of satan/again Saddam vs Bush

 
 
  Although it is a remarkably old practice, lapidation  seems regionally circumscribed to the Middle East and the Mediterranean bassin . the symbolic ceremony of satan lapidation or stoning is indeed  one of the most important rituals of the fifth pillar of islam that is  pilgrimage   . the ceremony consists in throwing  stones by millions of pilgrims on three rocks representing the devil . it is said that When  prophet Abraham left Mina  and on his way to al aqaba the Devil appeared to him  three times : at the big rock  , the middlle rock  and at the little rock.angel Gabriel asked abraham to pelt the devil with stones each time it appeared .abraham did and the devil completely withdrew .
  lapidation is  cosidered in many cultures as  the worst form of punishment, for instance men or women who dare commit adultery or incest are stoned to death  in some cultures  .we all remember the first intifada which  was memorably characterized  by Palestinian youths throwing stones  at israeli  tanks and soldiers.well i'am not going to give you a course about lapidation .i just want to make an analogy between the lapidation of satan and the shoes throwing on bush .what is the significance of such an act?   throwing a shoe on somebody is a sign of disgust ,it is a big insult but it is much more a punishment for bad deeds .we saw in 2003 after the fall of baghdad scores of iraqis stoning saddam's statute and hiting his portraits with shoes, but it never happened to real saddam .today it is the turn of bush .bush who has come to make a fare well visit to iraq was perhaps expecting iraqis to recieve him with  a bunch  of flowers  in return for what he has done for them .he helped them to get rid of saddam , he brought democracy to the region , he recostructed iraq ,,,,,,,,,.his good deeds are indeed uncountable!!!!!!!! but what happened ? why iraqis are so ungrateful ?  .i guess that the albaghdadia journalist would have liked to offer outgiong bush a bunch of good smelling  flowers but iraq has been over the last few years the scene of unprecedented violence  .the iraqi land has been watered by tons and tons of blood .flowers no longer grow on that land , so  instead and because of the flower crisis in baghdad Muntazer al-Zaidi offered  bush a pair of" good smelling" shoes probably made in  the  USA .
 
 
    ouarda lebnane


Téléchargez le nouveau Windows Live Messenger ! Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit !

Sunday, December 14, 2008

This is a farwell kiss YA KALB!

(By Jennifer Loven, AP white house correspondent)
BAGHDAD – On an Iraq trip shrouded in secrecy and marred by dissent,
President George W. Bush on Sunday hailed progress in the war that
defines his presidency and got a size-10 reminder of his unpopularity
when a man hurled two shoes at him during a news conference.

"This is a farewell kiss, you dog!" shouted the protester in Arabic,
later identified as Muntadar al-Zeidi, a correspondent for
Al-Baghdadia television, an Iraqi-owned station based in Cairo, Egypt.

Bush ducked both shoes as they whizzed past his head and landed with a
thud against the wall behind him.

"It was a size 10," Bush joked later.

Syria: Kurds say Property Law discriminatory

·                                 IWPR

·                                 12/12/2008 00:00:00

(12-Dec-08) Syrian Kurds continue to voice concern about new legislation limiting rights to sell and rent out land in border areas, arguing that it amounts to discrimination against their community, and will harm the economic prospect in these parts of the country.
Decree No. 49, which President Bashar al-Assad signed into law in September, places tight restrictions on the ownership and use of land in areas near the country's borders with both Israel and Turkey.
The most controversial parts of the decree state that residents of border areas cannot sell real estate without obtaining prior permission from the authorities, specifically the interior, defence and agriculture ministries. Anyone who owns property must also get authorisation to rent or lease it out for a period of more than three years.
Radif Mustafa, a lawyer and chairman of the Kurdish Committee for Human Rights, said he believed the law directly targets Kurds, who make up the majority in areas bordering on Turkey.
"The al-Quneitra border is a special case because part of it is occupied by Israel, but why are the areas along the Turkish border included in the law, when Syrian-Turkish relations are now better than ever?" he asked.
"This is part of the discrimination practiced against the Kurds who populate those border areas."
More than 1.5 million Kurds live in northern regions of Syria bordering Turkey and Iraq.
Last month, nearly 200 Kurdish protesters were arrested after staging a protest in Damascus against the new rules. Hirfin Awsi, a public relations worker, was beaten with a metal baton before being taken away by police.
"We said nothing against the government or the president," she said. "Our protest was peaceful."
Luqman Oso, a member of the governing committee of Azadi, one of seven Kurdish parties that issued a statement in October condemning the property decree, said non-violent protests would continue.
"We succeeded in gathering a large number of Kurdish parties together, and we will continue our peaceful and democratic struggle until this decree is abolished," he said.
Khalaf al-Jarad, director general of Al-Wahda, a press group that publishes the leading state daily Al-Thawra, insists the law has been misinterpreted.
"I feel very sad and full of regret, and I am astonished how Decree no. 49, which deals with ownership, is being interpreted," he said in remarks quoted by the Quds Press news agency. "It is a regulatory decree that does not target a specific individual or group, but instead deals with matters of buying and selling. If some of our Kurdish brothers want to exaggerate this, they'll lose out because no one is going to believe the way they are interpreting the decree."
In border regions directly affected by the new rules, lawyer and activist Suleiman Ismail said there was considerable confusion about how to put them into practice.
"All legal actions involving property have ground to a halt because the judiciary cannot make any decision on these cases without instructions from the executive, and these have not been issued yet," he said. "We have no idea what the future of real estate in the province will be after this."
Those tasked with enforcing the decree can provide little useful information.
"We received the decree and we were required to implement it immediately, but we have received no instructions on how to do this," said an employee of the property registration office in al-Hiska. "We've simply been told to stop all registrations of ownership."
While confusion about enforcement continues, the economic repercussions are already being felt.
"We used to sell about 100 tons of iron per month, and now we're hardly sell ten tons – and that goes to government building contractors or to ongoing projects that started before this decree was issued," said Hussein Abbas, a civil engineer in al-Hiska. "Construction contractors are not buying iron or cement because no new licenses are being granted at the moment."
Mohammed Salih Salo, a building contractor from al-Qamishli, said uncertainty about the new law had left many afraid to buy and sell property.
"Construction work has stopped because people have suffered a loss of confidence," he said. "Previously, we could sell or buy real estate, pay the money and then get a license from the court. Now, people with money are not buying anything because property cannot be registered in their name in the government records, and that creates a problem of trust between sellers and buyers."
"We want to get the necessary licenses," he insisted. "We want to work, no matter what. But the government offices don't have any regulations relating to the new decree, so we're at a standstill."
The latest economic hardships have forced some Kurds to seek work elsewhere.
Mohammed al-Khatib, a carpenter by trade with a wife and two children to support, has come to the capital where he has found a job in a workshop.
"I have come to Damascus because the contractor we used to work with doesn't have a business any more," he said. "Most of the guys I'm working with are from al-Hiska province, and the majority are Kurdish. They want to earn a living any way they can, regardless of their occupation."
(Syria News Briefing, a weekly news analysis service, draws on information and opinion from a network of IWPR-trained Syrian journalists based in the country.)

 


Thursday, December 11, 2008

IFJ Condemns Detention of Journalist against Court Order in Iraq

 
The International Federation of Journalists(IFJ) today condemned the decision of the United States military authorities in Iraq to remand in detention Ibrahim Jassam Mohammed, an Iraqi journalist freelance photographer , whose release was ordered by the Iraqi Central Criminal Court last month.

"We strongly condemn this decision which makes a mockery of the coalition's handover of powers to Iraqi sovereign institutions," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary.

According to media reports, the U.S military said Ibrahim will remain in prison on the grounds of security risk he poses and his release will be processed according to his individual threat level.

The Iraqi Central Criminal Court ordered Ibrahim's release on 30 November after prosecutors had admitted he had no case to answer and dropped charges against him.

The IFJ reiterates its demand for the immediate and unconditional release of Ibrahim

"The American military officials in Iraq should stop interfering with the Iraqi justice and free Ibrahim." added White.




 


British channel island Sark tasting democracy (From Guardian)

Turnout approaches 90% as 474 voters get their first taste of democracy

Some sat and attentively crunched the numbers as the count continued
late into last night. For other candidates hoping to win a place in
the history books as members of the first democratically-elected
government on the island of Sark it was just too much and they
adjourned to the fug of the bar upstairs - smoking is still allowed
here - and nervously nursed glasses of wine and beer.

The end of 450 years of feudalism on this three-mile chunk of rock has
been an exciting, but often tense process. "I couldn't stay in there
any longer," said one of the hopefuls, Christine Audrain. "I found my
jaw locking with tension. I had to come and have a glass of wine."

To the casual outsider the election must seem like a harmless bit of
fun. But for the people of Sark, the last bastion of feudalism in the
west, it is absolutely serious as the turnout showed, almost 90% of
the 474 electors.

Over the last weeks, months, even years, two factions battling for
control of the island's parliament, the chief pleas, have emerged.
Broadly one side supports the Barclay brothers, the multi-millionaire
twins who own the Telegraph and the Ritz hotel. They live on the
neighbouring island of Brecqhou and are ploughing millions of pounds
into Sark, refurbishing its muddy main street and buying up most of
the hotels.

In yesterday's Daily Telegraph, Sir David Barclay said he would be
"very tempted" to walk away from Sark if the "establishment" got
re-elected. Such a move would be disastrous because the Barclays
control so much of Sark's main industry, tourism. The "establishment"
Sir David is referring to is suspicious of the twins and more loyal to
the old feudal lord, the "seigneur", many of whose powers are being
swept away.

Last night there was no sign of the Barclays at the count. They are
not standing and did not vote. Nor was there any sign of their man on
Sark, estate manager Kevin Delaney, though he has put his name
forward. He said he was worried that it could turn ugly if he turned
up to the island hall for the count. A pin-striped lawyer sat in his
place to make sure all was fair.

Actually the atmosphere was more like a party. Children were allowed
to stay up late. Families made a night out of it. As the count neared
midnight, it was too close to call. Candidates branded "wholly
unworthy" of the voters' faith in a bulletin published by the Barclays
seemed certain to be heading for places in the parliament, which will
annoy the twins.

"The community is going to win," said one. Some of the Barclays'
favourites seemed to be struggling.

Earlier in the day under the eye of Sark's judge and returning
officer, not to mention a healthy selection of the world's press,
Roger Olsen was the first to cast his vote.

Olsen posted his slip, tapped the ballot box and declared it a "happy
day", adding: "Sark has an opportunity to express itself, to determine
its own destiny."

Suzie Thorpe was next to put her Xs besides her 28 preferred
candidates. "It's very exciting. It's good for the island," she said.
What issues was she concerned about? "We need a good, sustainable
economy. But we don't want the island to change too much. We don't
want any helipads, thank you," - a reference to a Barclay plan to
build one.

Peter Stisted, one of those candidates on the Barclays' "unworthy"
list said: "It's incredibly nerve-racking. I can't believe it's so
serious. It's one of the most important days of my life."

Publican Paul Burgess, who was on a second list of nine candidates who
have won the approval of the Barclays, braved bitter winds to station
himself outside the hall in a smart suit and bright pink tie to try to
mop up any waverers. Barring a recount, the Sarkees will be poring
over the results this morning trying to work out what sort of a
parliament they have chosen and wondering if it means the Barclays'
investment will dry up.

And after the election the hard work really begins - Sark has no civil
servants and the government's business is run by committee. When the
attention of the world's media has gone, there will be a great deal to
do.

Post by: TJC - just to prove that not only the MENA is looking for democracy

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

IRAQ: Journalist jailed for sodomy article released

CPJ09/12/2008 00:00:00

New York, December 9, 2008 — The Committee to Protect Journalists welcomes a presidential pardon for a journalist in Iraqi Kurdistan who had been sentenced to six months in prison, in direct violation of the region's press law.


Adel Hussein, a medical doctor and a freelance journalist with the independent weekly Hawlati, was found guilty of violating "public custom" on November 24 by a court in Arbil, the regional capital, for publishing an article in April 2007 in Hawlati about sodomy and health. He was sent to an Arbil prison the same day. Instead of using the region's new press law, the sentence handed down was based on the outdated 1969 Iraqi penal code, said Luqman Malazadah, Hussein's lawyer.


President Massoud Barzani gave the pardon on Sunday, one day before the Muslim celebration of Eid, the journalist told CPJ. According to the president's Web site, Hussein's was part of a group of 121 pardons made in the region.


"We are relieved that President Barzani intervened to right this injustice," said CPJ Deputy Director Robert Mahoney. "We call on the authorities to ensure that the new legislation is enforced and that Adel Hussein is the last journalist to be sent to prison in Iraqi Kurdistan because of his work."


A new, October press law does not recognize violations of "public custom" as an offense; prison terms have been entirely eliminated for journalists. Hussein said he was shocked to be tried for the article since he has written three books and hundreds of articles on sex and health previously with no legal action.


This was not the first time that judges in Iraqi Kurdistan have sent journalists to prison in violation of the region's press law. A criminal court in Sulaymania recently convicted Shwan Dawdi, editor-in-chief of the Kirkuk-based newspaper Hawal, on three defamation charges filed by a retired judge. After nine days in jail, Dawdi was released when a court of appeal overturned the verdict and said that the journalist should be tried under the new law.




Thursday, December 4, 2008

 
 

The Gaza salvation

Hope is eternal, but so too appears the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, writes Ramzy Baroud*

When Gaza's electricity is in working order, most Palestinians in the impoverished and overcrowded Strip huddle around their television screens. It's neither "American Idol" nor "Dancing with the Stars" that brings them together. It's the news.
Gazans' relationship to news media is both complex and unique. Like most Palestinians everywhere, they intently watch and listen to news broadcasts the world over, with the hope that salvation will arrive in the form of a news bulletin. Evidently, salvation is yet to be aired.
That infatuation is hardly coincidental, however, as their purpose of reading, listening and watching is unmistakable. Palestinians deeply care about what the rest of the world is saying about their plight and struggle. Most importantly, they wonder if anyone out there cares.
During the first Intifada's long and harsh Israeli military curfews in Gaza, my family would gather around a small radio, always nervous that the batteries would die, leaving us with a total news blackout; a horrible scenario by Gaza's standards.
The Israeli army used to habitually cut off electricity and water for whatever refugee camp that was targeted for a crackdown. The practice persists to this day in Gaza, but on a much larger scale, where fuel is denied, food and medical supplies are alarmingly scarce, and water generators are in a pitiable state. So-called collective punishment has always been the pinnacle of Israel's policy towards the miserable Strip. Some things never change.
Regardless, somehow Gaza miraculously manages. The people of that tiny stretch of land find ways to cope with their ample tragedies, as they did the moment the first caravan of refugees, parched and desperate, made their way into Gaza following the 1948 Nakba. They weep for their loss, bury their dead, ask God for mercy, and, once again, return home to huddle around their radios, seeking a glimpse of hope in news broadcasts.
Today, their trust, or lack thereof in any news station depends largely on whether that particular station is committed to articulating their suffering and tragedy, as it is seen from their viewpoint, not that of an Israeli army's spokesperson; thus their love-hate relationship with major news networks like the BBC, Voice of America and others. Although most Palestinians in Gaza find Al-Jazeera network most understanding to their plight, they can never forgive it for providing a platform for Israeli government and army officials. Still, most Palestinians tune in to Al-Jazeera as a trustworthy outlet whenever tragedy strikes, and it often does.
News from Gaza and news about Gaza has hardly ever been as grim as it is these days. Every single day, there are statements attributed to UN officials and human rights organisations, decrying the siege on Gaza, the strangulation of a whole population, and the deafening silence of the international community towards what is now perceived as the world's most pressing humanitarian catastrophe. Palestinians in Gaza listen ever intently. They hope, although apprehensively, that perhaps the United States will pressure Israel to ease its siege, to allow medical access for the terminally ill, to restore fuel supplies. Yet day after day, the situation worsens and little is done to rectify the injustice.
When international officials, such as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki- Moon or former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson call on Israel to ease or end the sanctions on Gaza, Gazans move a bit closer to their televisions. They insist on believing that Israel will eventually heed the calls, but always to no avail.
It was "almost unbelievable" that the world did not care about "a shocking violation of so many human rights" in Gaza, said Robinson, who is also former president of Ireland, as reported on the BBC 4 November. "Their whole civilisation has been destroyed, I'm not exaggerating," she said.
On that same day, Israel moved into Gaza with the intent of provoking a fight and ending the shaky truce with Hamas, which has largely held since June. The army killed six Palestinians and wounded three.
John Ging, director of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in Gaza, told The Washington Post 15 November, "This is a disastrous situation, and it's getting worse and worse... It is unprecedented that the UN is unable to get its supplies in to a population under such obvious distress; many of these families have been subsisting on this ration for years, and they are living hand-to-mouth."
Since then, on 20 November, the same official reported that Israel reversed a decision to let 70 truckloads of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip.
Philip Luther of Amnesty International decried "Israel's latest tightening of its blockade [which] has made an already dire humanitarian situation markedly worse."
"Chronic malnutrition is on a steadily rising trend and micronutrient deficiencies are of great concern," said a leaked report by the Red Cross, as reported in The Independent. The report said that Israeli restrictions are causing "progressive deterioration in food security for up to 70 per cent of Gaza's population".
Gazans are still flipping through the channels and cranking the radio dials, left and right, as these calls continue to fall on deaf ears. They wonder why their plight is not treated with the same urgency as that of the Red Sea piracy or even that of eastern Congo, despite the fact that their misery has perpetuated for generations, and is worsening.
They also pass by Arabic channels and wonder about the seemingly never-ending party, while Gaza has been reduced to total desolation. They listen to Fatah and Hamas officials spewing insults and fighting over government positions that don't exist and territories that hold no sovereignty. They shake their heads in dismay and carry on, for perhaps tomorrow will bring with it some good news -- for once.
* The writer is editor of PalestineChronicle.com .
 
/NA

Holding Gaza hostage

Gaza's humanitarian crisis escalates as the world watches in silence. Dina Ezzat reports from Cairo, Saleh Al-Naami from Gaza

Click to view caption
HOPE UNDER SIEGE: A Palestinian child flashes the victory sign during a demonstration calling on Egyptian authorities to open the Rafah crossing
As Al-Ahram Weekly went to press Wednesday Arab foreign ministers were convening for an extraordinary meeting against the backdrop of an explosive humanitarian crisis in Gaza where 1.5 million Palestinians are suffering the effects of Israel's 22-day long blockade.
Gaza's population has been systematically deprived of electricity, medicine, medical supplies, fuel and food. Over the past week Arab TV news channels have been transmitting live footage of the human tragedy, including scenes of critically ill Palestinians awaiting treatment in Gaza's hospitals pleading with the Arabs, and not Israel, for "mercy". One elderly woman suffering from heart disease and diabetes asked Al-Jazeera on Monday: "We are Muslims, why are the Arabs leaving us to die? Why isn't Egypt opening the [Rafah] borders?"
But in Cairo Arab foreign ministers are unlikely to offer anything of substance to the Palestinians. Diplomats who spoke to the Weekly on condition of anonymity say there are three reasons why the Cairo meeting will end with little meaningful help being offered to Gaza. First is the reluctance of the Palestinian Authority to solicit Arab support. "The issue has become strictly Fatah versus Hamas," commented one Cairo- based Arab diplomat.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah, will interpret Arab support for Gaza as indirect support for Hamas.
In the words of another Arab diplomatic source: "Abbas does not want Arabs to even talk to Hamas. He was furious when [Arab League Secretary-General Amr] Moussa met with [Hamas leader Khaled] Meshaal in Damascus on the fringe of Arab League meetings."
Abbas, the source suggested, complained to Cairo and Amman that Moussa was lending credence to Hamas at a time when Hamas should be forced to submit to Fatah.
Abbas has reportedly demanded that the PA, and not the Hamas government in Gaza, be credited for any assistance advanced to Palestinians living in the Strip. Otherwise, he argues, Hamas will emerge the victor.
The second problem is Egypt's reluctance to unilaterally open the Rafah Crossing, the only link Gaza has with the outside world that is not under Israeli control, for humanitarian assistance. The Rafah Crossing, says Cairo, is designed for the passage of individuals not commodities and it can only be operated after the PA, which left Gaza under Hamas control in the summer of 2007, returns to the Strip. This, Egypt argues, could have been achieved through the national reconciliation it was trying to mediate earlier this month but which Hamas abandoned after complaining Abbas was harassing its members in the West Bank and that the mediation process was biased towards Fatah.
Egyptian officials now say it is up to Hamas to end Gaza's misery, first by suspending Qassam rocket attacks against Israeli targets and denying the Israeli government any pretext to impose a blockade and then by pursuing national reconciliation that will allow for the Palestinian Authority to return to Gaza and the Rafah Crossing to be reopened.
The third reason the Arab foreign ministers meeting yesterday at the Cairo-based headquarters of the Arab League will fail to reach any agreement on a rescue package is that even those Arab countries sympathetic to Hamas and supportive of a more inclusive approach to Palestinian decision-making, remain unwilling to confront Cairo over the need to open Rafah.
"It is a matter of Egyptian sovereignty and there is not much we can do," said one Syrian diplomatic source.
The most that can be expected from the meeting is a resolution blaming Israel for the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip but containing no retaliatory measures against Tel Aviv should it continue with the siege. As one senior Hamas source said, "when the Palestinian Authority is encouraging the siege and coordinating with Israel it is hard to expect other Arab countries to worry much about the Palestinians".
The Wednesday meeting is certain to call for continued reconciliation efforts and demand that the incoming US administration prioritise a final peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians.
Meanwhile, in Gaza, the lives of thousands of Palestinians are threatened. Palestinian Health Minister Bassem Naim told the Weekly that recurrent power cuts have paralysed health services and death "on a large scale" is expected. Central oxygen supply stations catering to the needs of patients with respiratory problems are barely operational. Sterilisation equipment for surgeries no longer functions and pasteurisation machines for milk are no longer operational. The entire system of intensive care in Palestinian hospitals is on the verge of collapse.
Israel opened border crossings with the Gaza Strip on Monday, allowing in limited amounts of food and fuel for the second time in three weeks after the United Nations warned of a looming humanitarian crisis. Aid groups say the one-day shipment will have minimal impact because border crossings have been closed for so long, depleting reserves of everything from flour to animal feed.
"It is just not enough," says Christopher Gunness, spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Gunness reports that UNRWA cannot function normally without a steady stream of supplies, not only food but books for schoolchildren, also blocked by Israel for weeks.
Israel first imposed its siege on Gaza after the power struggle between Hamas and Fatah resulted in Hamas's takeover over of the Strip in June 2007. The aim of the siege is ostensibly to weaken Hamas and remove it from power yet it is Gaza residents who daily pay the price of an increasingly deadly political equation.
 
 
/NA

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Food for thought

Take five and read all of this. It sets of a lot of thinking about saving one's own community.  /SK

Calling All Pakistanis
Published: December 3, 2008
On Feb. 6, 2006, three Pakistanis died in Peshawar and Lahore during violent street protests against Danish cartoons that had satirized the Prophet Muhammad. More such mass protests followed weeks later. When Pakistanis and other Muslims are willing to take to the streets, even suffer death, to protest an insulting cartoon published in Denmark, is it fair to ask: Who in the Muslim world, who in Pakistan, is ready to take to the streets to protest the mass murders of real people, not cartoon characters, right next door in Mumbai?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/opinion/03friedman.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

the courage of a woman

      she joined  the group a week after the beginning of the seminar on journalism and democracy  .we were all waiting for her to arrive .each time we were told she is still at rafah  ""barrier  "".katarina has been changing her flight for several times until she succeeded to  cross the barrier of shame.before i met her in the early morning in the kitchen ,i was expecting to see an a bitter and angry person  but i was surprised to find in front of me a joyful and happy women .she spoke about her 5 day experience at rafah as if she was speaking about an excursion .no complains ,no bitterness .she was even making jokes about the troubles she has faced at the frontiers .
     before we left sweeden she was afraid she would face the same problem .she was longing to meet her children she was missing too much .we spend the last day together at Radisson hotel ,went out ;took pictures played with the snow ......at 3 pm we  said good bye to  each other and then Adnan  who was the last to leave accompanied her with samia to the airport . when he returned back he told me samia has left but ola's flight was cancelled .I really felt sorry for her i said to myself ""it is the begining of the troubles "".the algerian group flight  to frankfort was at 7 pm .I  headed to the airoport 2 hours before,  I looked for her every where but i dindn't find her ......but my surprise was great  when i learnt that ola was taking the same plane as me  .Instead of complaining about her flight being cancelled ,she said  with her usual laugh , i'am happy this happend to meet you again .We 've laughed and joked  all along the flight and  again we said good bye to each other at frankfort airoport...
 Now after many days of  waiting , of suffering ,of hope and despair  ola is finally among her family .her children who have been deprived of their mother have now the right to be happy despite electricity cuts and so on .ola finally succeeded to cross the barrier of shame and entered the big prison of gaza strip  .have you ever seen somebody happy to go back to the prison !!!! compared to other palestinians Ola is lucky because she had the apportunity to get out of this prison and breath some fresh air what about  her besieged  fellow citizens  who are daily strugglingto stay alive ???
  I hail ,and we should all hail your courage and your perseverence OLA , the courage of a mother , of a woman, of a journalist and mainly the courage of a human being who has the right to be considered as such  ....... Ola may all your  days be happy ...keep on smiling ...
  
 
 ouarda lebnane

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Citizen of the world

"Citoyen du monde, partout chez moi, (pour tous) etranger." Words of
Erasmus, done as installation by Marie-Jo Lafontaine at Stockholm
Airport, in multilinguistic treatment. Brilliant and fitting for an
airport. A place where people are sedentarily transient....

Monday, December 1, 2008

Kurdistan's press pays for tackling corruption

The Financial Times - By Fnna Fifield07/11/2008 00:00:00
(Suleimaniya) - To promote freedom of the press and provoke social and political change, reporters are not shying away from stories of state corruption.

For three nights out of every 14, Ahmed Mira does not sleep at home. He no longer walks on the street either, nor does he drive his own car anywhere. Such is the life of an independent magazine editor in Kurdistan, the northern Iraqi province where journalists say they are coming under increasing pressure not to write about government corruption.

"We are proud of not having red lines, of crossing the boundaries and touching the most sensitive issues," says Mr Mira, editor of Lvin ("Movement"), a fortnightly magazine that has homed in on corrupt officials.

Such pride comes at a high price. One of Lvin's reporters, 23-year-old Soran Mama Hama, was gunned down outside his home in Kirkuk in July, shortly after writing about police links to a prostitution ring. His picture now adorns every wall and door in the Lvin office.

Freedom of the press does not seem to reign supreme"Soran received threatening messages for three months before he was killed," says Mr Mira, who also receives such calls, almost daily. Now, he stays elsewhere immediately following publication to try to avoid becoming a target at home.

While democratic Kurdistan is often heralded as a role model for the rest of Iraq, the government - or more specifically, the two parties that run almost every facet of life in the semi-autonomous region - are regularly accused of shady practices.

Lvin, circulation 25,000, and independent Kurdish newspapers including Hawlati, Awene and Rozhnama are leading the charge. Much more so than the rest of Iraq, Kurdistan has a lively independent press seeking to offer an alternative news diet.

"Our role is to bring about political change in this society," Mr Mira says in his office in Suleimaniya.

"We will try to change as much as we can, including the two corrupt political parties who monopolise everything," he says, referring to the Kurdistan Democratic party, which is headed by Masoud Barzani, the regional president, and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, led by Jalal Talabani, the president of Iraq. Mr Mira says he is most proud of publishing stories about Mr Barzani's official residence, which the magazine said was as secretive as an aircraft's black box recorder, and another entitled "The Sick Man", about Mr Talabani's health.

Questions of loyalty and patriotism

The latter story led to Mr Mira spending 13 hours in prison, accused of being a traitor. Independent Kurdish papers say they are coming under increasing pressure not to write such "unpatriotic" stories. Mr Barzani recently told editors not to write about corruption generally but rather to report specific details of specific cases, and to have the documents to back up their claims, according to three editors at the meeting.

"We will go on reporting corruption cases and the games that the political parties play to try to silence us," says Karam Rahim, editor of Hawlati, the biggest independent paper in Kurdistan, who says he told the president he would not desist. Hawlati ("Citizen"), which reaches more than 50,000 people each week, has been sued 35 times over stories about corruption.

"We are working to make sure that corruption does not become a habit among our people, and we are working to improve our society so it becomes more open minded and modern," Mr Rahim says.

American officials in Iraq are concerned about recent attempts to clamp down on the Kurdish press.

"There have been a number of instances in the past six months in which reporters have been harassed, detained, pressurised not to write about corruption," says a senior US official in Baghdad. "Sometimes we really question the [regional government's] commitment to a truly democratic Kurdistan."

Government denial of claims

The government denies suggestions it is corrupt or undemocratic, and the president's office refutes claims it is putting pressure on any media outlets.

"There is no official pressure," says Fuad Hussein, the president's chief of staff. "The president told the editors that it's their right to publish about corruption but that when they accuse someone they should have proof.

"They should not make black into white," Mr Hussein told the Financial Times. This was advice not pressure, he added.

Regardless, Judit Neurink, a Dutch journalist who runs the Independent Media Centre in Suleimaniya, training Kurdish journalists, says the non-state press is certainly "stirring things up".

"Independent media are necessary in this country to open up a few more eyes to what is really happening," Ms Neurink says, although she sometimes has difficulty convincing reporters of the difference between "freedom of the press" and fiction.

Mr Mira, for one, says he will not waver. "Yes, of course it is very difficult," he shrugs, "but we must not bow to the pressure from the government."

Pregnant journalist lost her baby as attacked by security forces

• KurdishMedia.com - By Mohammed Ali
• 27/11/2008 00:00:00
London (KurdishMedia.com) 27 November 2008: A Kurdish journalist lost her baby as she was attacked by the security forces, Asayish, reported the committee for the protection of Kurdistan's Journalists (CPKJ) this earlier this week.
On 21 November 2008, Asayish, the Kurdish security forces, in the Kurdistan governorate of Sulemani raided the residential home of a Kurdish woman journalist, Mrs Banaz Ali Noori, reported CPKJ.
During the raid by Asayish, her husband was arrested and Mrs Noori lost her baby by miscourage due to the trauma of the raid. She was four month pregnant, CPKJ stated.
The Committee to Protect of Kurdistan's Journalists has strongly condemned the raid and the arrest. The Committee states, "while in Kurdistan, there is a week-long campaign to promote women's rights, the Assaish of Sulemani ill-treats a female journalist and uses violence against her."
"The perpetrators of the attack should be arrested and face trial immediately," CPKJ added.

Posted By Adnan to MENA El AMAN at 11/30/2008