
Monday, December 15, 2008
Bush shoe attack

the lapidation of satan/again Saddam vs Bush
Although it is a remarkably old practice, lapidation seems regionally circumscribed to the Middle East and the Mediterranean bassin . the symbolic ceremony of satan lapidation or stoning is indeed one of the most important rituals of the fifth pillar of islam that is pilgrimage . the ceremony consists in throwing stones by millions of pilgrims on three rocks representing the devil . it is said that When prophet Abraham left Mina and on his way to al aqaba the Devil appeared to him three times : at the big rock , the middlle rock and at the little rock.angel Gabriel asked abraham to pelt the devil with stones each time it appeared .abraham did and the devil completely withdrew .
lapidation is cosidered in many cultures as the worst form of punishment, for instance men or women who dare commit adultery or incest are stoned to death in some cultures .we all remember the first intifada which was memorably characterized by Palestinian youths throwing stones at israeli tanks and soldiers.well i'am not going to give you a course about lapidation .i just want to make an analogy between the lapidation of satan and the shoes throwing on bush .what is the significance of such an act? throwing a shoe on somebody is a sign of disgust ,it is a big insult but it is much more a punishment for bad deeds .we saw in 2003 after the fall of baghdad scores of iraqis stoning saddam's statute and hiting his portraits with shoes, but it never happened to real saddam .today it is the turn of bush .bush who has come to make a fare well visit to iraq was perhaps expecting iraqis to recieve him with a bunch of flowers in return for what he has done for them .he helped them to get rid of saddam , he brought democracy to the region , he recostructed iraq ,,,,,,,,,.his good deeds are indeed uncountable!!!!!!!! but what happened ? why iraqis are so ungrateful ? .i guess that the albaghdadia journalist would have liked to offer outgiong bush a bunch of good smelling flowers but iraq has been over the last few years the scene of unprecedented violence .the iraqi land has been watered by tons and tons of blood .flowers no longer grow on that land , so instead and because of the flower crisis in baghdad Muntazer al-Zaidi offered bush a pair of" good smelling" shoes probably made in the USA .
ouarda lebnane
Téléchargez le nouveau Windows Live Messenger ! Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit !
Sunday, December 14, 2008
This is a farwell kiss YA KALB!
BAGHDAD – On an Iraq trip shrouded in secrecy and marred by dissent,
President George W. Bush on Sunday hailed progress in the war that
defines his presidency and got a size-10 reminder of his unpopularity
when a man hurled two shoes at him during a news conference.
"This is a farewell kiss, you dog!" shouted the protester in Arabic,
later identified as Muntadar al-Zeidi, a correspondent for
Al-Baghdadia television, an Iraqi-owned station based in Cairo, Egypt.
Bush ducked both shoes as they whizzed past his head and landed with a
thud against the wall behind him.
"It was a size 10," Bush joked later.
|
Thursday, December 11, 2008
IFJ Condemns Detention of Journalist against Court Order in The International Federation of Journalists(IFJ) today condemned the decision of the "We strongly condemn this decision which makes a mockery of the coalition's handover of powers to Iraqi sovereign institutions," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. According to media reports, the U.S military said Ibrahim will remain in prison on the grounds of security risk he poses and his release will be processed according to his individual threat level. The Iraqi Central Criminal Court ordered Ibrahim's release on 30 November after prosecutors had admitted he had no case to answer and dropped charges against him. The IFJ reiterates its demand for the immediate and unconditional release of Ibrahim "The American military officials in |
British channel island Sark tasting democracy (From Guardian)
Some sat and attentively crunched the numbers as the count continued
late into last night. For other candidates hoping to win a place in
the history books as members of the first democratically-elected
government on the island of Sark it was just too much and they
adjourned to the fug of the bar upstairs - smoking is still allowed
here - and nervously nursed glasses of wine and beer.
The end of 450 years of feudalism on this three-mile chunk of rock has
been an exciting, but often tense process. "I couldn't stay in there
any longer," said one of the hopefuls, Christine Audrain. "I found my
jaw locking with tension. I had to come and have a glass of wine."
To the casual outsider the election must seem like a harmless bit of
fun. But for the people of Sark, the last bastion of feudalism in the
west, it is absolutely serious as the turnout showed, almost 90% of
the 474 electors.
Over the last weeks, months, even years, two factions battling for
control of the island's parliament, the chief pleas, have emerged.
Broadly one side supports the Barclay brothers, the multi-millionaire
twins who own the Telegraph and the Ritz hotel. They live on the
neighbouring island of Brecqhou and are ploughing millions of pounds
into Sark, refurbishing its muddy main street and buying up most of
the hotels.
In yesterday's Daily Telegraph, Sir David Barclay said he would be
"very tempted" to walk away from Sark if the "establishment" got
re-elected. Such a move would be disastrous because the Barclays
control so much of Sark's main industry, tourism. The "establishment"
Sir David is referring to is suspicious of the twins and more loyal to
the old feudal lord, the "seigneur", many of whose powers are being
swept away.
Last night there was no sign of the Barclays at the count. They are
not standing and did not vote. Nor was there any sign of their man on
Sark, estate manager Kevin Delaney, though he has put his name
forward. He said he was worried that it could turn ugly if he turned
up to the island hall for the count. A pin-striped lawyer sat in his
place to make sure all was fair.
Actually the atmosphere was more like a party. Children were allowed
to stay up late. Families made a night out of it. As the count neared
midnight, it was too close to call. Candidates branded "wholly
unworthy" of the voters' faith in a bulletin published by the Barclays
seemed certain to be heading for places in the parliament, which will
annoy the twins.
"The community is going to win," said one. Some of the Barclays'
favourites seemed to be struggling.
Earlier in the day under the eye of Sark's judge and returning
officer, not to mention a healthy selection of the world's press,
Roger Olsen was the first to cast his vote.
Olsen posted his slip, tapped the ballot box and declared it a "happy
day", adding: "Sark has an opportunity to express itself, to determine
its own destiny."
Suzie Thorpe was next to put her Xs besides her 28 preferred
candidates. "It's very exciting. It's good for the island," she said.
What issues was she concerned about? "We need a good, sustainable
economy. But we don't want the island to change too much. We don't
want any helipads, thank you," - a reference to a Barclay plan to
build one.
Peter Stisted, one of those candidates on the Barclays' "unworthy"
list said: "It's incredibly nerve-racking. I can't believe it's so
serious. It's one of the most important days of my life."
Publican Paul Burgess, who was on a second list of nine candidates who
have won the approval of the Barclays, braved bitter winds to station
himself outside the hall in a smart suit and bright pink tie to try to
mop up any waverers. Barring a recount, the Sarkees will be poring
over the results this morning trying to work out what sort of a
parliament they have chosen and wondering if it means the Barclays'
investment will dry up.
And after the election the hard work really begins - Sark has no civil
servants and the government's business is run by committee. When the
attention of the world's media has gone, there will be a great deal to
do.
Post by: TJC - just to prove that not only the MENA is looking for democracy
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
IRAQ: Journalist jailed for sodomy article released CPJ09/12/2008 00:00:00 New York, December 9, 2008 — The Committee to Protect Journalists welcomes a presidential pardon for a journalist in Iraqi Kurdistan who had been sentenced to six months in prison, in direct violation of the region's press law. Adel Hussein, a medical doctor and a freelance journalist with the independent weekly Hawlati, was found guilty of violating "public custom" on November 24 by a court in Arbil, the regional capital, for publishing an article in April 2007 in Hawlati about sodomy and health. He was sent to an Arbil prison the same day. Instead of using the region's new press law, the sentence handed down was based on the outdated 1969 Iraqi penal code, said Luqman Malazadah, Hussein's lawyer. President Massoud Barzani gave the pardon on Sunday, one day before the Muslim celebration of Eid, the journalist told CPJ. According to the president's Web site, Hussein's was part of a group of 121 pardons made in the region. "We are relieved that President Barzani intervened to right this injustice," said CPJ Deputy Director Robert Mahoney. "We call on the authorities to ensure that the new legislation is enforced and that Adel Hussein is the last journalist to be sent to prison in Iraqi Kurdistan because of his work." A new, October press law does not recognize violations of "public custom" as an offense; prison terms have been entirely eliminated for journalists. Hussein said he was shocked to be tried for the article since he has written three books and hundreds of articles on sex and health previously with no legal action. This was not the first time that judges in Iraqi Kurdistan have sent journalists to prison in violation of the region's press law. A criminal court in Sulaymania recently convicted Shwan Dawdi, editor-in-chief of the Kirkuk-based newspaper Hawal, on three defamation charges filed by a retired judge. After nine days in jail, Dawdi was released when a court of appeal overturned the verdict and said that the journalist should be tried under the new law. |
